Legalization of Recreational Drugs
In 1970, Congress passed the
Controlled Substance Act, which made illicit drugs illegal at the federal
level. The question then arose: does this act supersede the powers given to
Congress- without the existence of an amendment? Or does the act protect the people from themselves? Drugs
outlawed within the Controlled Substance Act include cocaine, heroin, opiates
and marijuana. It is estimated
according to the text Taking Sides, that before this act was passed,
less than one-half of one percent of the population used cocaine, heroin and
opiates. The use of marijuana is
obviously quite a bit higher.
One
major argument for the legalization of illicit drugs is that it would save
taxpayers billions of dollars a year in incarceration expenses. Author Bryan Stevenson contends that
one in 31 adults in the U.S. is involved in probation, jail, prison and parole
systems. Over 68 billion dollars a
year is spent on imprisonment costs.
He states that drug treatment and counseling programs are far more
effective than incarceration in helping drug users beat addictions. Racial discrimination also comes into
play when talking about drug incarceration. Communities of color have historically been targeted by law
enforcement, and prison sentences are lengthier if caught with crack-cocaine
(found in lower income areas) versus regular cocaine (found in more affluent
areas). Even though cocaine is
more pure, and in effect more dangerous.
On
the other hand, author Theodore Dalrymple argues that drugs should remain
illegal because of the effect it has on a community and society at large. Addiction affects not only the user, but
also spouses, children, and entire neighborhoods. He states that by legalizing these drugs that have been
illegal for so long would create an uncontrollable waterfall effect. People
would not be able to control their newfound freedom, and many would become
addicts with socially undesirable effects. He acknowledges that we will never
win the ‘war on drugs,’ but that shouldn’t stop us from trying. Theft is illegal, but still happens,
but no one advocates abandoning the law that prohibits thievery. Thus, we should not abandon the law
prohibiting illicit drug use.
On
a personal level, I am an advocate for lessening prison sentences concerning
drug use. Far too many people are
incarcerated for low level drug crimes- or for first time use. I am all for reducing the number of
inmates in the prison system that I pay taxes to support. However, I do not
advocate for the complete legalization of drugs like cocaine, heroin and
opiates. The dangers those three
categories pose to society and families are far too great to ignore. But an increase in drug treatment
versus automatic prison sentencing for possession or first time offenders
should be imposed. Marijuana, on the other hand I feel differently.
Marijuana
Legalization
Marijuana
has a lengthy history of different feelings from the American people and policy
makers. “Reefer Madness” occurred
in the 1930s, and thrust marijuana paranoia well into the last half of the 19th
century. Recently though,
marijuana acceptance has grown drastically. While still illegal at the federal
level under the Controlled Substance Act, states have begun to legalize the
drug. According to the Huffington
Post on June 29, 2013, 18 states and the District of Columbia have legalized
marijuana use for medical purposes, and Colorado and Washington state have
outright legalized it for recreational use. And policy makers in D.C. have remained silent on the
issue.
On
August 28, 2012, the Huffington Post published an article in favor of
legalizing marijuana, citing that marijuana is less dangerous and less
addictive than alcohol and cigarettes.
Marijuana is less addictive, and when used incurs less injuries than
alcohol. It is also impossible to
die of an overdose on marijuana, whereas it is possible to die from alcohol. Legalizing marijuana could also not only
save taxpayers money, but generate millions of dollars in tax revenue. With the passing of Amendment 64 in
Colorado, the state will generate about $12 million dollars annually in law
enforcement savings, and earn about $100 million a year in tax revenue. By getting marijuana off the streets
and into a regulated business industry, it would make it harder for youth under
21 to get ahold of the substance.
On
the other hand, The Daily Caller published an article on July 19, 2012
discrediting the marijuana legalization movement. The author states that long term effects of marijuana use
includes the loss of short term memory, slows reaction time, and although the
study is not cited, the article insists that studies have proven that marijuana
is more addictive than alcohol. On a societal level, statewide legalization of
marijuana would create an even larger market for drug cartels. Since the federal government has not
legalized the drug, many reputable growers and manufacturers will abstain from
the business for fear of federal troubles. Thus, only those who partake in the business now underground
will continue to do so, but legally.
On
a personal level, I whole-heartedly believe marijuana should be legalized. Too many friends and general members of
society are in legal trouble for possessing small amounts of the drug. It’s a crime that unnecessarily upsets
lives that could have been productive members of society. It’s not the small
use of marijuana that obstruct people from contributing to society, it’s the
legal trouble that keeps good people out of certain jobs they would be best at. On an economic level, legalizing the
drug would only benefit states.
Already, Colorado has seen huge profit from Amendment 64. Street gangs are pocketing money that
could be going to support local governments and public structures. Bottom line, the use of marijuana will
always be a part of our society on a massive scale. Legalize, regulate, and profit from an activity that will
always be around.
No comments:
Post a Comment